Cases 41 - 50 of 722
Jones v. Phillips et al
as 3:2024cv00414
Plaintiff:
Nakomis Jones
Defendant:
Amber L. Phillips and John Doe #1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
James v. Phillips et al
as 3:2024cv00415
Plaintiff:
Hathaway James
Defendant:
Amber L. Phillips and John Doe #1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gardner v. Phillips et al
as 3:2024cv00406
Plaintiff:
Demond Gardner
Defendant:
Amber L. Phillips and John Doe #1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cathey v. Phillips et al
as 3:2024cv00402
Plaintiff:
Eric Cathey
Defendant:
Amber L. Phillips and John Doe #1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Downs v. Phillips et al
as 3:2024cv00401
Plaintiff:
Audrey E. Downs
Defendant:
Amber L. Phillips and John Doe #1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gillispie v. Phillips et al
as 3:2024cv00403
Plaintiff:
Jermuriel Gillispie
Defendant:
Amber L. Phillips and John Doe #1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rollins v. Phillips et al
as 3:2024cv00486
Plaintiff:
Steve Rollins
Defendant:
Amber L. Phillips and John Doe #1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ordway v. Phillips et al
as 3:2024cv00464
Plaintiff:
Korbyn Ordway
Defendant:
Amber Phillips and John Doe #1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Perry v. Williams et al
as 3:2024cv00463
Plaintiff:
Anthony E. Perry
Defendant:
Yolanda Williams, Amber L. Phillips and John Doe #1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pitts v. Capital One Financial Corporation et al
as 3:2024cv00047
Plaintiff:
Shantell Pitts
Defendant:
Capital One Financial Corporation and Capital One, N.A.
Petitioner:
Scott C. Savett, Sheryl Barnes, Samuel Hans and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
