Cases 41 - 50 of 22,666
Gearding v. United States of America et al.
as 1:2024cv00311
Plaintiff:
Zola Gearding
Defendant:
United States of America, Department of Veterans Affairs, Sencer Goklemez, Individually and in his Official Capacity, and Lawrence Brennan, Individually and in his Official Capacity
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Hill v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv01115
Petitioner:
William Hill
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Terry v. United States of America
as 2:2024cv02373
Petitioner:
Princess Terry
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Robinson v. United States of America
as 2:2024cv02374
Petitioner:
Alford Robinson
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Deandrea BrownIn re: Deandrea Brown
as 24-1479
Petitioner:
In re: DEANDREA ANTHONY BROWN
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Gillespie v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv00945
Plaintiff:
Andrea Gillespie
Defendant:
United States of America US Attorney for Northern District of Ohio
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
George Sachs v. Ricardo Inc., et al
as 24-1468
Plaintiff:
GEORGE SACHS, dba Paradyme Systems USA
Defendant:
RICARDO INC., WESLEY SCHARMEN, PHILIP MICHAEL and others
Dionne TurnerIn re: Dionne Turner
as 24-3456
Petitioner:
In re: DIONNE D. TURNER
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Kenneth GardnerIn re: Kenneth Gardner
as 24-1467
Petitioner:
In re: KENNETH GARDNER
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Ohio Telecom Association, et al v. FCC, et al
as 24-3449
Petitioner:
OHIO TELECOM ASSOCIATION and USTELECOM, The Broadband Association
Respondent:
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
