Cases 41 - 50 of 89
Clinton Thorn v. Medtronic, Inc., et al
as 15-1533
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CLINTON THORN
Defendant - Appellee:
MEDTRONIC, INC., a Minnesota Corporation and MEDTRONIC SOFAMOR DANEK USA, INC., a Tennessee Corporation
Glenard Thorne v. South Central Correctional Fa, et al
as 15-5382
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GLENARD C. THORNE
Defendant - Appellee:
SOUTH CENTRAL CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, "SCCF", MICHAEL PARRISH and DANIEL PRITCHARD
Defendant:
BRENDA PEVAHOUSE and HANK INMAN
Thorn v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2015cv00347
Plaintiff:
Martha Pauline Thorn
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Thorn v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2015cv00357
Plaintiff:
Patricia Lynn Thorn
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Thorn v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
as 2:2014cv02402
Plaintiff:
Joseph Timothy Egan Thorn
Defendant:
Commissioner Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Hinneburg et al v. Miron et al
as 2:2014cv14076
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Hinneburg and Ashlee Hinneburg
Defendant:
Nicole Miron, Lukas Edringer, David Ealy and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
In re: In Re; HCA Holdings, Inc.
as 14-511
Petitioner:
In re: HCA HOLDINGS, INC., RICHARD M. BRACKEN, R. JOHNSON and others
Respondent:
KARSTEN SCHUH and NEW ENGLAND TEAMSTERS & TRUCKING INDUSTRY PENSION FUND
Glenard Thorne v. Jerry Lester
as 14-6214
Petitioner - Appellant:
GLENARD C. THORNE
Respondent - Appellee:
JERRY LESTER, Warden
Thorne v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 1:2014cv01696
Plaintiff:
Richard Thorne
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Thorn v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2014cv00955
Plaintiff:
Richard Harold Thorn
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
