Cases 51 - 60 of 1,024
Thomas v. Phillips et al
as 3:2024cv00375
Plaintiff:
Derwin Valentino Thomas
Defendant:
Amber L. Phillips and John Doe #1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cortez et al v. Sterling Card Solutions Holdings, LLC
as 3:2024cv00338
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Cortez and Phillip Matoy
Defendant:
Sterling Card Solutions Holdings, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Perkins v. Phillips et al
as 3:2024cv00315
Plaintiff:
Rathal Perkins
Defendant:
Amber L. Phillips and John Doe #1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Phillips v. State Auto Property & Casualty Insurance Company
as 3:2024cv00309
Plaintiff:
Karen Phillips
Defendant:
State Auto Property & Casualty Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Insurance Contract
Houston v. Phillips
as 4:2024cv00026
Petitioner:
Emmanuel Bibb Houston
Respondent:
Shawn Phillips and Herbert Slatery
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Doss v. Phillips et al
as 3:2024cv00282
Plaintiff:
Harold Doss
Defendant:
Amber L. Phillips and John Doe #1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Craig v. Phillips et al
as 3:2024cv00250
Plaintiff:
Clifton D. Craig
Defendant:
Amber L. Phillips and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Phillips et al
as 3:2024cv00242
Plaintiff:
James Johnson
Defendant:
Amber L. Phillips and John Doe #1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pegues v. Phillips et al
as 3:2024cv00236
Plaintiff:
Sebastian Pegues
Defendant:
Amber L. Phillips and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Phillips v. Marion County Sherriff's Department et al
as 1:2024cv00090
Plaintiff:
Bryan R. Phillips
Defendant:
Marion County Sherriff's Department, John Doe #1, John Doe #2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
