Cases 51 - 60 of 127
Jason Borden v. David Hayse, et al
as 16-5110
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JASON DEAN BORDEN
Defendant - Appellee:
DAVID HAYSE, PARK CITY DAILY NEWS, U.S. MARSHAL STAFF and others
Smith v. U.S. Marshal Service et al
as 4:2016cv00005
Plaintiff:
Earnest Otto Smith
Defendant:
U.S. Marshal Service, Grayson County Detention Center, Assistant U.S Attorney David Wieser and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Woodson v. Corrections Corporation of America et al
as 4:2015cv02679
Plaintiff:
Allen Woodson
Defendant:
Corrections Corporation of America, U.S. Marshalls Office and St. Elizabeth Medical Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Essex v. U.S. Marshal Service for the Eastern District of Kentucky et al.
as 5:2015cv00279
Plaintiff:
John Michael Essex
Defendant:
U.S. Marshal Service for the Eastern District of Kentucky , Roger Daniel , Jacob M. Frick and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Christopher Harris v. U.S. Marshals Service
as 15-5807
Petitioner - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER HARRIS
Respondent - Appellee:
U.S. MARSHAL SERVICE
Harris v. U.S. Marshal
as 6:2015cv00120
Plaintiff:
Christopher L. Harris
Defendant:
U.S. Marshal
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Jason Borden v. David Hayse, et al
as 15-5720
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JASON DEAN BORDEN
Defendant - Appellee:
DAVID HAYSE, PARK CITY DAILY NEWS, U.S. MARSHAL STAFF and others
Borden et al v. U.S. Marshalls Office Service et al
as 1:2015cv00085
Petitioner:
Jason Dean Borden and Nancy S. Douglas
Respondent:
U.S. Marshalls Office Service and U.S. District Court
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Julian Rochester v. Federal Prison Director, et al
as 15-5670
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JULIAN E. ROCHESTER
Defendant - Appellee:
FEDERAL PRISON DIRECTOR, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL, WILLIAM N. NETTLES, S.C. U.S. Attorney and others
Harris v. U.S. Marshal Service
as 6:2015cv00099
Petitioner:
Christopher Harris
Respondent:
U.S. Marshal Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
