Cases 61 - 70 of 157
Sutherland v. Smith
as 3:2017cv00111
Petitioner:
Roy Luke Sutherland, Jr.
Respondent:
Aaron Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Spencer v. Kentucky State Reformatory et al
as 6:2017cv00043
Petitioner:
Robert J. Spencer
Respondent:
Kentucky State Reformatory and Aaron Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Yale Balcar v. Patrick Kessinger, et al
as 17-5188
Plaintiff - Appellant:
YALE LARRY BALCAR
Defendant - Appellee:
PATRICK H. KESSINGER, JEANNETTE SISCO, Captain, JOSHUA DUGGINS and others
Yale Balcar v. Aaron Smith, et al
as 17-5159
Plaintiff - Appellant:
YALE LARRY BALCAR
Defendant - Appellee:
AARON SMITH, Kentucky State Reformatory, Warden and ARAMARK FOOD SERVICE, (KSR)
Gadd v. Smith
as 5:2017cv00057
Petitioner:
Owen Ray Gadd
Respondent:
Aaron Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Yale Balcar v. Aaron Smith, et al
as 17-5131
Plaintiff - Appellant:
YALE LARRY BALCAR
Defendant - Appellee:
WARDEN AARON SMITH, KENTUCKY STATE REFORMATORY, All Mail Room Staff, JENNIFER PARKS, Mailroom and others
Yale Balcar v. Aaron Smith, et al
as 17-5113
Plaintiff - Appellant:
YALE LARRY BALCAR
Defendant - Appellee:
AARON SMITH, Kentucky State Reformatory Warden, LT. DEANNA HAWKINS, SERGEANT KELLEY and others
Yale Balcar, et al v. Kentucky State Reformatory, et al
as 17-5069
Plaintiff - Appellant:
YALE LARRY BALCAR and CARL J. PERRY, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
KENTUCKY STATE REFORMATORY, KENTUCKY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, AARON SMITH and others
Donald Hall v. LaDonna Thompson, et al
as 17-5022
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DONALD RAY HALL
Defendant - Appellee:
LADONNA THOMPSON, Commissioner of DOC, WARDEN AARON SMITH, BOB ATKIN and others
Blackburn v. Kentucky State Reformatory et al
as 3:2017cv00019
Petitioner:
Jonah Blackburn
Respondent:
Kentucky State Reformatory, Aaron Smith, Correct Care Solution and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
