Cases 61 - 70 of 88
Hanas v. Seterus, Inc.
as 3:2014cv00174
Defendant:
Seterus, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Garrett J Hanas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Joann Super v. Seterus, Inc., et al
as 14-1334
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOANN SUPER
Defendant - Appellee:
SETERUS, INC., UNKNOWN TRUSTEE, THE UNKOWN TRUSTEE FOR THE UNKNOWN ASSET-BACKED-SECURITY IN WHICH THE MORTGAGE AT ISSUE WAS POOLED and UNKNOWN HOLDERS, the unknown holders of said asset-backed security
Estate of Winston J. Jackson v. Bank of America et al
as 2:2014cv11073
Defendant:
Bank of America , Seterus, Inc. and Federal National Mortgage
Plaintiff:
Estate of Winston J. Jackson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Street et al v. Seterus, Inc.
as 2:2014cv00068
Plaintiff:
Harold Street, Sandra Street and Chad Street
Defendant:
Seterus, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mayo et al v. Seterus, Inc et al
as 2:2014cv10705
Defendant:
Seterus, Inc and Federal National Mortgage Association
Plaintiff:
Brian Mayo and Kathryn Mayo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Sharon Lewis v. FNMA, et al
as 14-1082
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SHARON D. LEWIS
Defendant - Appellee:
FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION, SETERUS, INC. and BANK OF AMERICA
Trent v. Seterus, Inc et al
as 2:2013cv00333
Defendant:
Seterus, Inc , Federal National Mortgage Association and Shapiro & Kirsch, LLP
Plaintiff:
Ronald W. Trent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Fuoco v. Bank of America et al
as 4:2013cv13512
Plaintiff:
Joseph A. Fuoco
Defendant:
Bank of America and Seterus, Inc.
Boone v. Seterus, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv13457
Plaintiff:
Kimberley Boone
Defendant:
Seterus, Inc. , Federal National Mortgage Association , Unknown Trustee, the currently unknown Trustee of the asset-backed security at issue and others
Sharon Lewis v. FNMA, et al
as 13-1939
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SHARON D. LEWIS
Defendant - Appellee:
FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION, SETERUS, INC. and BANK OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
