Cases 71 - 80 of 157
Taylor v. USA et al
as 6:2014cv00167
Plaintiff:
Wallace Taylor
Defendant:
USA, Federal Bureau of Prisons, K. Edenfield and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Brown v. Doe #1 et al
as 7:2014cv00018
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Brown
Defendant:
John Doe #1 and Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Leigh v. John Doe #1 et al
as 7:2014cv00020
Plaintiff:
John S. Leigh
Defendant:
John Doe #1 and Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Stine v. Doe #1 et al
as 7:2014cv00019
Plaintiff:
Mikeal Stine
Defendant:
John Doe #1 and Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Thomas v. The Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 7:2014cv00011
Petitioner:
Anthony Lorenzo Thomas
Respondent:
The Federal Bureau of Prisons and Robert Farley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Pinson et al v. Doe #1 et al
as 7:2013cv00134
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Pinson, Jeremy Brown, Mikeal Stine and others
Defendant:
John Doe #1 and Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hynson v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 5:2013cv00201
Petitioner:
Rashaun Hynson
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Nowell v. Director of Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 5:2013cv00150
Petitioner:
Frederick Bradley Nowell, Sr.
Respondent:
Director of Federal Bureau of Prisons and Carlos Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Gravley v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 7:2013cv00050
Plaintiff:
Dwaune Gravley, Sr.
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Lewis v. Federal Bureau Prisons et al
as 6:2013cv00101
Plaintiff:
Darryl Lester Lewis
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons and USP McCreary
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
