Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Sims et al v. SNYDER et al
as 5:2018cv12387
Defendant:
Bradley Wurfel, Nick Lyon, Andy Dillon and others
Plaintiff:
Terry R. Prewitt, Aston Marion, Marion Harris-Ivey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sims et al v. SNYDER et al
as 2:2018cv12387
Plaintiff:
Valdene Sims , James Coley , Constance Edwards and others
Defendant:
RICHARD D. SNYDER, Flint, City of, Receivership Transition Advisory Board and others
Adams-Kiel et al v. Snyder et al
as 2:2018cv11416
Plaintiff:
Lawanda Adams-Kiel , George Kiel , Lawrence Adolph and others
Defendant:
Richard Dale Snyder , Flint, City of, Receivership Transition Advisory Board and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Douglas et al v. Snyder et al
as 2:2018cv11287
Plaintiff:
Willie Douglas , Etta Douglas , Charles Shehee and others
Defendant:
Richard Dale Snyder , City of Flint , Receivership Transition Advisory Board and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cooper et al v. Snyder et al
as 5:2018cv10486
Plaintiff:
Oleka Cooper , K. C. , Stacie Clark and others
Defendant:
Richard Dale Snyder, City of Flint, Receivership Transition Advisory Board and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
MASTERS et al v. Lockwood, Andrews & Newnam, P.C. et al
as 2:2017cv12289
Plaintiff:
ALYSHA MASTERS , CANDIS DIXON , STEPHANIE DUNCAN and others
Defendant:
Lockwood, Andrews & Newnam, P.C., Lockwood, Andrews & Newnam, Inc., Leo A. Daly Company and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
United States of America v. Thirty Thousand Seven Hundred Seventeen and 47/100 Dollars ($30,717.47) in United States Currency et al
as 2:2011cv00735
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Thirty Thousand Seven Hundred Seventeen and 47/100 Dollars ($30,717.47) in United States Currency , A 2003 Hummer, H-2, A 2008 Chevrolet Corvette and others
Claimant:
Delaino Garland
Movant:
Samuel Cavin and U.S. Bank
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
