Cases 1 - 10 of 1,252
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv01633
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00526
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Davis v. Fender
as 5:2024cv01564
Respondent:
Warden Douglas Fender
Petitioner:
Robert Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Vestis Services, LLC v. DCP Tool Manufacturing, LLC et al
as 3:2024cv00249
Defendant:
Robert J. Davis, First Tool Corporation, DCP Tool Manufacturing, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Vestis Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 6901 Environmental Cleanup Expenses
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01548
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Davis v. Warden, Pickaway Correctional Institution
as 2:2024cv03925
Respondent:
Warden, Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction
Petitioner:
Jeffrey Alan Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Davis, Jr. v. City of Ashtabula et al.
as 1:2024cv01533
Defendant:
Ashtabula Municipal Jail, City of Ashtabula and Ashtabula Police Department
Plaintiff:
Kenneth B. Davis, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv03922
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Evans v. Davis et al.
as 4:2024cv01499
Defendant:
Warden Anthony Davis and John and Jane Does
Plaintiff:
Johnny Evans
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Krzywkowski v. Mohr et al
as 2:2024cv03902
Defendant:
Warden Keith Foley, Katrenia Baker-Webb, Dessey Cheers and others
Plaintiff:
Grady Krzywkowski
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
