Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Michael Eaves v. Rodney Ballard, et al
as 21-5754
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL EAVES
Defendant:
RODNEY BALLARD, Commissioner, JOHN M. DUNN, Ombudsman, BRANDON LYNCH, Administrative Specialist and others
Defendant / Appellee:
CHRISTIAN TOELKE, Classification and Treatment Officer and STEFANEY HUGHES, Unit 1 Administrator
Michael Eaves v. Rodney Ballard, et al
as 21-5628
Defendant:
BRANDON LYNCH, Administrative Specialist, JOHN M. DUNN, Ombudsman, JACK GODBEY, Unit II Unit Administrator and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL EAVES
Defendant / Appellee:
CHRISTIAN TOELKE, Classification and Treatment Officer and STEFANEY HUGHES, Unit 1 Administrator
Michael Eaves v. Rodney Ballard, et al
as 21-5670
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL EAVES
Defendant:
RODNEY BALLARD, Commissioner, JOHN M. DUNN, Ombudsman, BRANDON LYNCH, Administrative Specialist and others
Defendant / Appellee:
CHRISTIAN TOELKE, Classification and Treatment Officer and STEFANEY HUGHES, Unit 1 Administrator
Michael Eaves v. Rodney Ballard, et al
as 20-5277
Defendant:
BRANDON LYNCH, Administrative Specialist, JOHN M. DUNN, Ombudsman, JACK GODBEY, Unit II Unit Administrator and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL EAVES
Defendant / Appellee:
CHRISTIAN TOELKE, Classification and Treatment Officer, STEFANEY HUGHES, Unit 1 Administrator and EARL WALLS, Unit 1 Assistant Unit Administrator
Darrell Miles v. KY Dept. of Corrections, et al
as 17-5848
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DARRELL L. MILES
Defendant - Appellee:
KENTUCKY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, LADONNA H. THOMPSON, Commissioner, DON BOTTOM, Warden and others
Eaves v. Ballard et al
as 5:2017cv00111
Plaintiff:
Michael Eaves
Defendant:
Rodney Ballard, John M. Dunn, Brandon Lynch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Miles v. Kentucky Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2015cv00126
Plaintiff:
Darrell L. Miles
Defendant:
Kentucky Department of Corrections, LaDonna Thompson, Don Bottom and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
