Cases 1 - 10 of 5,576
Garcia v. Davol Inc et al
as 2:2024cv02700
Plaintiff:
Edward Rudy Garcia
Defendant:
Davol Inc and CR Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Wirt v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02718
Plaintiff:
Gary Edward Wirt
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Francisco et al v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02633
Plaintiff:
Edward J. Francisco and Lauren Francisco
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Edwards v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02608
Plaintiff:
Larry Edwards, Sr.
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Elsasser v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02567
Plaintiff:
Edward Elsasser
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Ferguson v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02568
Plaintiff:
Edward Ferguson
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Wilhoit v. Indivior Inc. et al.
as 1:2024sf65662
Plaintiff:
Edward Wilhoit
Defendant:
Indivior Inc., Indivior PLC, Indivior Solutions, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Michael Fleming v. Wayne County, MI, et al
as 24-1215
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL DELON FLEMING
Defendant:
WAYNE COUNTY, MI, BENNY N. NAPOLEON, MICHAEL KNAUS, 1st Shift Sgt. and others
Edwards v. Bradley
as 5:2024cv00093
Plaintiff:
Kareem M. Edwards
Defendant:
Warden David Bradley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Edwards v. Indivior Inc. et al.
as 1:2024sf65505
Plaintiff:
April D Edwards
Defendant:
Indivior Inc., Indivior PLC, Indivior Solutions, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
