Cases 1 - 10 of 41
Williams v. Harcha
as 1:2023cv01355
Plaintiff:
Emery F. Williams
Defendant:
Judge Howard H. Harcha
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nash v. Bacerra
as 2:2023cv00567
Plaintiff:
Emery Nash and Estate of Emery Nash
Defendant:
Xavier Bacerra
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 7422 Appeal from Administrative Decision
Hill v. Stark County Sheriff et al
as 5:2023cv00236
Plaintiff:
Charles S. Hill
Defendant:
Stark County Sheriff, Corrections SGT. Eaton, Corrections Officer Pries and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00175
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 2607
Emery v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv04679
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Suzanne Emery
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Walburn et al v. Centrus Energy Corp. et al
as 2:2020cv04621
Plaintiff:
Chaz Lawson, Vicki P. Slone, James A Walburn and others
Defendant:
Clyde Dulin, Lockheed Martin Corporation, Bechtel Jacobs Co LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964
Lovelace v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2020cv00788
Plaintiff:
Michael Emery Lovelace
Defendant:
Andrew Saul, Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206
Emery v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv01758
Plaintiff:
Larry L Emery
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc. Polpropylene Hernia Mesh Product Liability Litigation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Johnson v. Toyota Motor Corporation et al
as 5:2019cv01669
Plaintiff:
Donald Johnson and Michael Emery
Defendant:
Toyota Motor Corporation, Toyota Motor North America, Inc., Toyota Motor Sales U.S.A. Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DeTray et al v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv02210
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Emery DeTray and Deborah DeTray
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
