Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00105
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00780
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
USA ex rel., James Doghramji, et al v. Community Health Systems, Inc, et al
as 20-5469
Defendant / Appellee:
MARION HOSPITAL CORPORATION, dba Heartland Regional Medical Center, BIG SPRING HOSPITAL CORPORATION, dba Scenic Mountain Medical Center, CARLSBAD MEDICAL CENTER, LLC, Carlsbad Medical Center and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES DOGHRAMJI, RACHEL BRYANT and SHEREE COOK
Plaintiff:
AMY COOK-RESKA, NANCY REUILLE, KATHLEEN A. BRYANT and others
USA ex rel., James Doghramji, et al v. Community Health Systems, Inc, et al
as 20-5462
Defendant / Appellee:
MARION HOSPITAL CORPORATION, dba Heartland Regional Medical Center, BIG SPRING HOSPITAL CORPORATION, dba Scenic Mountain Medical Center, CARLSBAD MEDICAL CENTER, LLC, Carlsbad Medical Center and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES DOGHRAMJI, RACHEL BRYANT and SHEREE COOK
Plaintiff:
AMY COOK-RESKA, NANCY REUILLE, KATHLEEN A. BRYANT and others
USA, et al v. Community Health Systems, Inc, et al
as 15-6280
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ex rel., JAMES DOGHRAMJI, SHEREE COOK and others
Defendant - Appellant:
COMMUNITY HEALTH SYSTEMS, INC., CHHS HOSPITAL COMPANY, LLC, d/b/a Chestnut Hill Hospital, DYERSBURG HOSPITAL CORPORATION, d/b/a Dyersburg Regional Medical Center and others
DeIorio v. Flower Hospital
as 3:2010cv00716
Plaintiff:
Andrea M DeIorio
Defendant:
Flower Hospital
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Maupins v. ProMedica Health System, Inc. et al
as 3:2010cv00271
Plaintiff:
Joann Maupins
Defendant:
ProMedica Health System, Inc., Flower Hospital and Toledo Hospital, The
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
