Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-1808
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Aaron Hill, et al v. Kia Motors America, Inc., et al
as 23-5663
Plaintiff / Appellant:
AARON HILL, Individually and by next friend and next of kin John Hill, Deceased and James Hill, Deceased and LYNETTA HILL, Individually and by next friend and next of kin of John Hill, Deceased and James Hill, Deceased
Defendant / Appellee:
KIA MOTORS AMERICA, INC., a California corporation, KIA MOTORS CORPORATION, a corporation headquartered in the Republic of (South) Korea, HYUNDAI-KIA AUTOMOTIVE GROUP, a corporation headquartered in the Republic of (South) Korea and others
Kim Carroll v. Eva Hill, et al
as 21-3885
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KIM ARLENE CARROLL
Defendant / Appellee:
EVA ARLENE HILL, individually and as former Executrix of the Estate of Albert P. Barber, aka Eva Arlene Barber, MICHELLE BARBER, WILLIAM A. BARBER and others
Aaron Hill, et al v. Kia Motors America, Inc., et al
as 20-5690
Defendant / Appellee:
HYUNDAI MOTOR AMERICA, INC., a California corporation, HYUNDAI-KIA AUTOMOTIVE GROUP, a corporation headquartered in the Republic of (South) Korea, KIA MOTORS AMERICA, INC., a California corporation and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LYNETTA HILL, individually, AARON HILL, by next friend and next kin of John Hill, Deceased and James Hill, Deceased, LYNETTA HILL, by next friend and next kin of John Hill, Deceased and James Hill, Deceased and others
Leanne Walters, et al v. MI, et al
as 19-2012
Plaintiff / Appellee:
SARAH CHEESEMAN, individually and as next friend of her children A.C. and D.C., SHAYLA ROBINSON, individually and as next friend of her children C.R.1, C.R.2, and S.H., FLOYD BELL, individually and as next friend to his child M.B. and others
Defendant / Appellant:
HOWARD CROFT, DAUGHERTY JOHNSON, CITY OF FLINT, MI and others
Not Classified By Court:
In re: FLINT WATER CASES
Defendant:
STATE OF MICHIGAN, et al
Leanne Walters, et al v. MI, et al
as 19-2008
Plaintiff / Appellee:
SARAH CHEESEMAN, individually and as next friend of her children A.C. and D.C., SHAYLA ROBINSON, individually and as next friend of her children C.R.1, C.R.2, and S.H., FLOYD BELL, individually and as next friend to his child M.B. and others
Defendant / Appellant:
RICHARD DALE SNYDER, former Governor, GRETCHEN WHITMER, Governor and ANDY DILLON, former State Treasurer
Not Classified By Court:
In re: FLINT WATER CASES
Defendant:
STATE OF MICHIGAN, et al
Leanne Walters, et al v. MI, et al
as 19-2000
Plaintiff / Appellee:
SARAH CHEESEMAN, individually and as next friend of her children A.C. and D.C., SHAYLA ROBINSON, individually and as next friend of her children C.R.1, C.R.2, and S.H., FLOYD BELL, individually and as next friend to his child M.B. and others
Defendant / Appellant:
STEPHEN BUSCH, BRADLEY WURFEL, PATRICK COOK and others
Not Classified By Court:
In re: FLINT WATER CASES
Defendant:
STATE OF MICHIGAN, et al
Leanne Walters, et al v. MI, et al
as 19-2005
Plaintiff / Appellee:
SARAH CHEESEMAN, individually and as next friend of her children A.C. and D.C., SHAYLA ROBINSON, individually and as next friend of her children C.R.1, C.R.2, and S.H., FLOYD BELL, individually and as next friend to his child M.B. and others
Not Classified By Court:
In re: FLINT WATER CASES
Defendant / Appellant:
ADAM ROSENTHAL
Defendant:
STATE OF MICHIGAN, et al
In re: Commerce Energy, Inc., et al
as 15-304
Petitioner:
COMMERCE ENERGY, INC., JUST ENERGY GROUP, INC. and JUST ENERGY MARKETING CORP.
Respondent:
DAVINA HUNT, Individually and on behalf of all other similarly situated and DOMINIC HILL, Individually and on behalf of all other similarly situated
Corey Lea v. AGRI, et al
as 14-5493
Plaintiff - Appellant:
COREY LEA
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, et al.
Defendant - Appellee:
WARREN COUNTY, KENTUCKY, FARMERS NATIONAL BANK, BARREN RIVER HEALTH DEPARTMENT and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
