Cases 1 - 7 of 7
New Doe Child #1, et al v. Congress Of The United States, et al
as 16-4345
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NEW DOE CHILD #1, NEW DOE CHILD #2, NEW DOE PARENT and others
Defendant:
CONGRESS OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY, UNITED STATES MINT and others
New Doe Child #1 et al v. Congress of the United States of America et al
as 5:2016cv00059
Plaintiff:
New Doe Child #1 , New Doe Child #2 , New Doe Parent and others
Defendant:
Congress of the United States of America, United States of America, U.S. Department of Treasury and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ickes v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv01426
Plaintiff:
Mary L Ickes
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. , Wal-Mart Stores East, LP , Wal-Mart Associates, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Eady v. Hanger Prosthetics and Orthotics, Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv00516
Plaintiff:
James Eady
Defendant:
Hanger Prosthetics and Orthotics, Inc. , Hanger Orthopedic Group , Hanger Prosthetics and Orthotics East, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Oberthaler v. Ameristep Corporation
as 5:2008cv01613
Defendant:
Gander Mountain Company, Gander Mountain Company, Ameristep Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
David A. Oberthaler and David A. Oberthaler
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Botts et al v. Ford Motor Company et al
as 1:2007cv03045
Plaintiff:
Christopher J. Botts and Christine L. Botts
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company, Ford Motor Company, QualChoice Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Swilley v. Tipton, et al
as 07-5794
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LAUREL KNUCKLES SWILLEY, individually and in her capacity as General Partner of the Ruth Hoe Knuckles Family Limited Partnership
Defendant - Appellee:
JEFFREY R. TIPTON and WESLEY R. TIPTON
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
