Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Smith v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00517
Plaintiff:
James Smith
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Smith v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv03076
Plaintiff:
James Smith
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Smith v. Bay & Bay Transfer Co., Inc.
as 5:2022cv00668
Plaintiff:
James Smith
Defendant:
Bay & Bay Transfer Co., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Smith Jr. v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv03430
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
James Smith Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv03305
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
James Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 1:2017dp20007
Plaintiff:
James Smith
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , DePuy, Inc. , DePuy International Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith v. State of Ohio Rehabilitation and Corrections et al
as 2:2015cv01272
Plaintiff:
James Smith
Defendant:
Correctional Officer Herren
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith et al v. Zimmer, Inc. et al
as 5:2012cv02542
Plaintiff:
Carla Smith and James Smith
Defendant:
Zimmer, Inc., Zimmer Holdings, Inc. and Zimmer Orthopaedic Surgical Products, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Smith et al v. Depuy Orthopedics, Inc. et al
as 1:2011dp23041
Plaintiff:
Helen Mary Smith and James Smith
Defendant:
Depuy Orthopedics, Inc. , DePuy, Inc. , DePuy International Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Northern Frozen Foods, Inc. v. Local 400 Food Terminal Employees' Pension Plan et al
as 1:2011cv00622
Plaintiff:
Northern Frozen Foods, Inc.
Defendant:
Local 400 Food Terminal Employees' Pension Plan , Charles A. Cimino, Jr. , John Lawson and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1451
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
