Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Joe Browder, Jr. v. Hopkins County, KY, et al
as 24-5177
Plaintiff:
JOE ALEXANDER BROWDER, JR. and HOPKINS COUNTY, KENTUCKY
Defendant:
MIKE LEWIS, DOCTOR SCOTT WILSON, WEST KENTUCKY CORRECTIONAL HEALTHCARE, LLC and others
Joe Browder, Jr. v. KY State Prison Officials, et al
as 15-5918
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOE ALEXANDER BROWDER, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
KENTUCKY STATE PRISON OFFICIALS, John Does and Jane Does, PHILLIP PARKER, Warden, JOHN DOE NOS. 1-6, President of Correctcare Integrated Health, Inc. and others
Joe Browder, Jr. v. KY State Prison Officials, et al
as 15-5918
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOE ALEXANDER BROWDER, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
KENTUCKY STATE PRISON OFFICIALS, John Does and Jane Does, PHILLIP PARKER, Warden, JOHN DOE, President of Correctcare Integrated Health, Inc. and others
Joe Browder, Jr. v. Ky State Prison Officials, et al
as 13-6659
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOE ALEXANDER BROWDER, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
KENTUCKY STATE PRISON OFFICIALS, John Does and Jane Does, PHILLIP PARKER, Warden, JOHN DOE, President of Correctcare Integrated Health, Inc. and others
Joe Browder, Jr. v. Cookie Crew
as 13-6274
Petitioner - Appellant:
JOE ALEXANDER BROWDER, JR.
Respondent - Appellee:
COOKIE CREWS, Warden
Joe Browder, Jr. v. Nancy Ankrom, et al
as 11-6428
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOE ALEXANDER BROWDER, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
NANCY ANKROM, SARA ESTES and TAMMY BUCHANAN
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00999
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692
Joe Browder, Jr. v. Scott Haas, et al
as 10-6170
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOE ALEXANDER BROWDER, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
SCOTT HAAS, Medical Director and MEDICAL DIRECTOR, KY State Prison
Defendant:
MICHAEL FAIRCHILD and DIRECTOR VA MEDICAL CENTER
Joe Browder, Jr. v. Phillip Parker, et al
as 10-6145
Petitioner - Appellant:
JOE ALEXANDER BROWDER, JR.
Respondent - Appellee:
PHILLIP PARKER, Warden and COMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
