Cases 1 - 10 of 595
State of Tennessee et al v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission et al
as 3:2024cv00224
Plaintiff:
State of Tennessee, State of Alabama, State of Alaska and others
Defendant:
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Charlotte A. Burrows, United States Department of Justice and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Favio Mazariegos-Mazariegos v. Merrick Garland
as 24-3402
Petitioner:
FAVIO ENEDY MAZARIEGOS-MAZARIEGOS
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. Attorney General
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02299
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1101 Immigration and Nationality Act
Irineo Herrera-Morales v. Merrick Garland
as 24-3391
Petitioner:
IRINEO HERRERA-MORALES
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. Attorney General
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02293
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1101 Immigration and Nationality Act
Juan Ordonez-Castro, et al v. Merrick Garland
as 24-3359
Petitioner:
JUAN ORDONEZ-CASTRO and LUCAS CORTEZ-LOPEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. Attorney General
Erik Ceniceros v. Merrick Garland
as 24-3345
Petitioner:
ERIK CENICEROS
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. Attorney General
Karamchand Doobay v. Merrick Garland
as 24-3331
Petitioner:
KARAMCHAND DOOBAY, aka Raj Doobay
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. Attorney General
Zuleima Ibarra-Rodallegas, et al v. Merrick Garland
as 24-3328
Petitioner:
ZULEIMA IBARRA-RODALLEGAS and NAHOMY ALESSANDRA DEL ANGEL-IBARRA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. Attorney General
Yatinkumar Patel, et al v. Merrick Garland
as 24-3323
Petitioner:
YATINKUMAR TRIBHOVANDAS PATEL, MITTAL YATINKUMAR PATEL and AARAV YATINBHAI PATEL
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. Attorney General
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
