Cases 1 - 10 of 1,953
Ellis v. Meigs County et al
as 2:2024cv03124
Plaintiff:
Charles Ellis
Defendant:
Meigs County, Donald Scott Fitch, Marty Hutton, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Card v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv00966
Plaintiff:
Adam Scott Card
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Harris v. Redwood et al
as 1:2024cv00306
Plaintiff:
James Harris
Defendant:
Warden Donald Redwood, Deputy Warden Cynthia Davis, Deputy Warden Nicole Joseph and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv03037
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02851
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Hibberd v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02757
Plaintiff:
Scott Hibberd
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Gudmundsen v. C.R. Bard, Inc. Polpropylene Hernia Mesh Product Liability Litigation
as 2:2024cv02729
Plaintiff:
Scott Gudmundsen
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. Polpropylene Hernia Mesh Product Liability Litigation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Wilbanks v. Davol Inc et al
as 2:2024cv02754
Plaintiff:
Alan Scott Wilbanks
Defendant:
Davol Inc and CR Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Griswold v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02749
Plaintiff:
Scott Griswold
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Gower v. Davol Inc et al
as 2:2024cv02599
Plaintiff:
Scott Gower
Defendant:
Davol Inc and C.R. Bard Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
