Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Arthur Butler v. Time Warner Entertainment Co., et al
as 15-3241
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ARTHUR L. BUTLER
Defendant - Appellee:
TIME WARNER ENTERTAINMENT COMPANY, L.P., dba Time Warner Cable and TIME WARNER CABLE MIDWEST LLC
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv00042
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv00645
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Scott P. Huberty v Time Warner Entertainment Company, LP, et al
as 5:2010cv02316
Plaintiff:
Scott P. Huberty
Defendant:
Time Warner Entertainment Company, L.P., Time Warner Cable Holdings Inc., Time Warner Cable Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2661
Bowen v. Time Warner Entertainment Company, L.P.
as 5:2010cv01301
Plaintiff:
Sean Bowen
Defendant:
Time Warner Entertainment Company, L.P.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv00659
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Time Warner Cable, a Division of Time Warner Entertainment Company L.P. v. Pfeilsticker
as 3:2008cv00010
Plaintiff:
Time Warner Cable, a Division of Time Warner Entertainment Company L.P.
Defendant:
Chris Pfeilsticker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007cv00305
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Collins v. Time Warner Entertainment Company, L.P. et al
as 1:2007cv00194
Plaintiff:
Janna Collins
Defendant:
Time Warner Entertainment Company, L.P., Time Warner Entertainment Company, L.P., Time Warner Entertainment Company, L.P. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
