Cases 51 - 60 of 993
Monte Merz v. Scott Kindybalyk
as 23-1711
Plaintiff / Appellee:
MONTE N. MERZ
Defendant / Appellant:
SCOTT E. KINDYBALYK, also known as Scott Kindy
Sunny Handicraft (H.K.) Ltd., et al v. Envision This!, LLC
as 21-1579
Defendant / Appellant:
ENVISION THIS! LLC
Plaintiff / Appellee:
BIN TEH HANDICRAFT (SHENZHEN) COMPANY, LTD., A China Coproration and SUNNY HANDICRAFT (H.K.) LTD., A HOng Kong Corporation
Charles Hess, et al v. Biomet, Inc., et al
as 23-1555
Plaintiff / Appellee:
CHARLES HESS, MARTY HIGGINS, ROBERT MCCORMICK, also known as GLEN MCCORMICK and others
Defendant / Appellant:
BIOMET, INC. and ZIMMER BIOMET HOLDINGS, INC.
Charles Hess, et al v. Biomet, Inc., et al
as 23-1556
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHARLES HESS, MARTY HIGGINS, ROBERT MCCORMICK, also known as GLEN MCCORMICK and others
Defendant / Appellee:
BIOMET, INC. and ZIMMER BIOMET HOLDINGS, INC.
Josef Bozek, et al v. Bank of America, N.A., et al
as 23-1524
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOSEF BOZEK and EVA BOZEK
Defendant / Appellee:
BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., PNC MORTGAGE and PNC BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
David Buschauer v. Columbia College Chicago
as 22-1228
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID BUSCHAUER, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Defendant / Appellee:
COLUMBIA COLLEGE CHICAGO
WEC 98C-3 LLC, et al v. SFA Holdings Inc.
as 23-1489
Plaintiff:
WEC 98C-3 LLC
Plaintiff / Appellee:
4 STRATFORD SQUARE MALL HOLDINGS, LLC
Defendant / Appellant:
SFA HOLDINGS INC., formerly known as SAKS INCORPORATED
Monte Merz v. Scott Kindybalyk
as 23-1699
Plaintiff / Appellee:
MONTE N. MERZ
Defendant / Appellant:
SCOTT E. KINDYBALYK, also known as Scott Kindy
Orion Eddlemon v. Bradley University
as 22-2560
Plaintiff / Appellee:
ORION EDDLEMON, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Defendant / Appellant:
BRADLEY UNIVERSITY
Jerico Cruz v. Upstart Network, Inc.
as 23-1587
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JERICO MATIAS CRUZ
Defendant / Appellee:
UPSTART NETWORK, INC.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
