Civil Rights Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit
Cases 111 - 120 of 5,788
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1095
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Type: Civil Rights Jobs
Shedrick Bowes-Northern v. City of Chicago, et al
as 24-1112
Plaintiff: SHEDRICK BOWES-NORTHERN
Defendant: CITY OF CHICAGO, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS, JOEL GORDILS, #8451 Chicago Police Officer and others
Donald Nicodemus v. City of South Bend, et al
as 24-1099
Plaintiff: DONALD NICODEMUS
Defendant: CITY OF SOUTH BEND, INDIANA and STATE OF INDIANA
Amicus Curiae: NATIONAL PRESS PHOTOGRAPHERS ASSOCIATION and 5 NEWS MEDIA ORGANIZATIONS
Antonia Gonzalez-Nunez v. Darelis Lopez Rosario, et al
as 24-1142
Plaintiff: ANTONIA M. GONZALEZ-NUNEZ
Defendant: DARELIS LOPEZ ROSARIO, Judge, CATHERINE M. BRUNELLE CURET, Judge and PUERTO RICO CENTRO JUDICIAL MUNICIPIO DE BAYAMON
Rhoda Stahmann v. Eric Muellenbach
as 24-1225
Plaintiff: RHODA STAHMANN
Defendant: ERIC MUELLENBACH
Jeffson St-Hilaire, et al v. Commissioner of the Indiana Bureau of Motor Vehicl
as 24-1187
Plaintiff: JEFFSON ST-HILAIRE, MERLANGE MEME, EVENKS MEME and others
Defendant: COMMISSIONER OF THE INDIANA BUREAU OF MOTOR VEHICLES, in his official capacity
Rickey Meneweather, Jr. v. Stephen Ritz, et al
as 24-1214
Plaintiff: RICKEY C. MENEWEATHER, JR.
Defendant: STEPHEN RITZ and MARLENE HENZE
Rhoda Stahmann v. Christopher Wray
as 24-1079
Plaintiff: RHODA STAHMANN
Defendant: CHRISTOPHER A. WRAY, Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation
Antonia Gonzalez-Nunez v. Ashley Murray
as 24-1131
Plaintiff: ANTONIA M. GONZALEZ-NUNEZ
Defendant: ASHLEY J. MURRAY
Joseph James v. Timothy Mace, et al
as 24-1037
Plaintiff: JOSEPH M. JAMES
Defendant: TIMOTHY MACE, Corporal Jailer also known as TIMOTHY EARL MACE, DALTON P. PFLUGHAUPT, individual, former employee of Michigan City Civil City, KELLY J. KENNEDY and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?