Civil Rights Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit
Cases 1 - 10 of 69
Udell Rogers v. Dorrie Love, et al
as 24-1147
Plaintiff: UDELL ROGERS
Defendant: DORRIE LOVE, CHAD SCHULDT, STANLEY SIMONSON and others
Harry Rapp v. SSM Agnesian Health, et al
as 24-1033
Plaintiff: HARRY R. RAPP
Defendant: SSM AGNESIAN HEALTH, KIMBERLY ROGERS and PAT GUELL
Lamar Robinson, et al v. Grace Knutson
as 23-2979
Plaintiff / Appellant: LAMAR ROBINSON and MARTELL D. ROGERS
Defendant / Appellee: GRACE E. KNUTSON
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-2170
Plaintiff / Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Type: Civil Rights Jobs
Holly Svendsen, et al v. Jay Pritzker, et al
as 23-1421
Plaintiff / Appellant: HOLLY SVENDSEN, JENNIFER SEWELL, BRIAN BEVILL and others
Defendant / Appellee: JAY R. PRITZKER, in his official capacity as Governor of the State of Illinois, ILLINOIS STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION, ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH and others
Clinton C. Barlow, III v. Freda L. Wolfson, et al
as 23-1187
Plaintiff / Appellant: CLINTON C. BARLOW, III
Defendant / Appellee: FREDA L. WOLFSON, ROGER TANEY, GARRET E. BROWN, JR. and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-3011
Plaintiff / Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Clinton Barlow, III v. Freda Wolfson, et al
as 22-2441
Plaintiff / Appellant: CLINTON C. BARLOW, III
Defendant / Appellee: FREDA WOLFSON, ROGER TANEY, GARRET E. BROWN, JR. and others
Michael Hekenberger v. Amanda Sonnenberg, et al
as 22-1865
Plaintiff / Appellant: MICHAEL F. HEKENBERGER
Defendant / Appellee: AMANDA SONNENBERG, BRIGIT O'CONNOR, formerly known as Bridgit Below, HEATHER RIMMER, formerly known as Heather Rogers and others
Adam Jarchow, et al v. State Bar of Wisconsin, et al
as 19-3444
Defendant / Appellee: JILL M. KASTNER, KATHLEEN A. BROST, CHRISTOPHER E. ROGERS and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: ADAM JARCHOW and MICHAEL D. DEAN

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?