Cases 21 - 30 of 151
Justin Dalcollo v. Anthony Wills, et al
as 23-2199
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JUSTIN L. DALCOLLO
Defendant / Appellee:
ANTHONY WILLS, FRANK LAWRENCE, JAMES MENDRICK and others
Glendal Rhoton v. Frank Vanihel
as 23-2122
Petitioner / Appellant:
GLENDAL RHOTON
Respondent / Appellee:
FRANK VANIHEL
Chad Malone v. Frank Vanihel
as 23-2098
Petitioner / Appellant:
CHAD MALONE
Respondent / Appellee:
FRANK VANIHEL
Nathaniel Harris v. Frank Littlejohn, et al
as 23-2083
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NATHANIEL HARRIS
Defendant / Appellee:
FRANK LITTLEJOHN, Assistant Superintendant, RICHARD BROWN, Warden, ANDREAN MASON, Supervisor and others
David Lyons v. Frank Vanihel
as 23-1869
Petitioner / Appellant:
DAVID E. LYONS
Respondent / Appellee:
FRANK VANIHEL, Warden
Frank Stork v. Kilolo Kijakazi
as 23-1558
Plaintiff / Appellant:
FRANK E. STORK
Defendant / Appellee:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI, Acting Commissioner of Social Security
Michael Carrico v. Richard Brown, et al
as 23-1381
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL R. CARRICO
Defendant / Appellee:
RICHARD BROWN, FRANK LITTLEJOHN, KEVIN GILMORE and others
Yusuf Hotep-El v. State of Indiana, et al
as 23-1325
Plaintiff / Appellant:
YUSUF HOTEP-EL, also known as JOSEPH DUWAYNE TUNSTILL
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF INDIANA, SOUTH BEND COMMUNITY RE-ENTRY CENTER, DUSHAN ZATECKY, Superintendent, Putnamville Correctional Facility and others
Darius Printup v. Indiana Department of Correction, et al
as 23-1292
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DARIUS PRINTUP
Defendant / Appellee:
INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION, ROBERT E. CARTER, JR., FRANK VANIHEL and others
Yusuf Hotep-El v. State of Indiana, et al
as 23-1259
Plaintiff / Appellant:
YUSUF HOTEP-EL, also known as JOSEPH DUWAYNE TUNSTILL
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF INDIANA, SOUTH BEND COMMUNITY RE-ENTRY CENTER, DUSHAN ZATECKY, Superintendent, Putnamville Correctional Facility and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
