Cases 21 - 30 of 81
John Redmond, IV v. Wendy Knight, et al
as 16-2390
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN H. REDMOND, IV
Defendant - Appellee:
WENDY KNIGHT, TIM PURCELL and OTHER UNKNOWN AGENTS
Gerald Jones v. Randy Pfister, et al
as 16-2270
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GERALD JONES
Defendant - Appellee:
RANDY PFISTER, GUY PIERCE, JOHN GARLICK, Supervisor Administrator of Mental Health and others
Percy Baker v. Rockford Police Department, et al
as 16-1375
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PERCY F. BAKER
Defendant - Appellee:
ROCKFORD POLICE DEPARTMENT, POLICE SERGEANT, City of Rockford Police Department, CITY OF ROCKFORD POLICE OFFICERS, Seven to Nine Officers and others
Edwin Tolentino v. Kim Butler, et al
as 16-1172
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EDWIN E. TOLENTINO
Defendant - Appellee:
KIM BUTLER, MICHAEL BAKER, #4922, Correctional Officer, KEVIN REICHERT and others
Edwin Tolentino v. Kim Butler, et al
as 15-3710
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EDWIN E. TOLENTINO
Defendant - Appellee:
KIM BUTLER, MICHAEL BAKER, #4922, Correctional Officer, KEVIN REICHERT and others
James Ferguson v. Wexford Health Sources, Incorp, et al
as 15-3397
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES FERGUSON, Jr.
Defendant - Appellee:
WEXFORD HEALTH SOURCES, INCORPORATED, RODERICK MADDOX, Regional Director, KURTIS HUNTER, Warden and others
Charles Dooley v. Kevin Winters, et al
as 15-2703
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLES DOOLEY
Defendant - Appellee:
KEVIN WINTERS, WANDA PENNOCK, AMY CLARK and others
Joseph Felton v. Rush Hospital, et al
as 15-2271
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSEPH FELTON
Defendant - Appellee:
RUSH HOSPITAL, RUSH DOCTORS NAMES UNKNOWN, RUSH MEDICAL STAFF NAMES UNKNOWN and others
Michael Thompson v. William Holm, et al
as 15-1928
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL L. THOMPSON
Defendant - Appellee:
WILLIAM HOLM, MATTHEW LARSON, RANDALL LASHOCK and others
Charles Hamilton v. Kevin Bird
as 15-1888
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLES HAMILTON
Defendant - Appellee:
KEVIN BIRD, unknown employee
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
