Cases 1 - 10 of 50
Charles Robinson v. Latoya Hughes, et al
as 24-1519
Plaintiff:
CHARLES MOHAMED ROBINSON, also known as Charles D. Robinson
Defendant:
LATOYA HUGHES, DISTRICT ONE PAROLE RE-ENTRY GROUP DEPUTY CHIEF, DISTRICT ONE PAROLE RE-ENTRY GROUP SUPERVISOR and others
David Delgado v. Latoya Hughes, et al
as 24-1407
Plaintiff:
DAVID DELGADO
Defendant:
LATOYA HUGHES, MARK WILLIAMS, JASON GARZA and others
Monzer Al Kassar v. Bryant McGee, et al
as 24-1376
Plaintiff:
MONZER AL KASSAR
Defendant:
BRYANT MCGEE, ANDREW MOULTON, JOHN HUGHES and others
Janiah Monroe, et al v. Steven Bowman, et al
as 23-3371
Plaintiff / Appellee:
JANIAH MONROE, MARILYN MELENDEZ, LYDIA H. VISION and others
Defendant / Appellant:
STEVEN BOWMAN, MELVIN HINTON and LATOYA HUGHES
Patrice Daniels, et al v. Latoya Hughes, et al
as 23-3110
Plaintiff / Appellee:
ASHOOR RASHO, PATRICE DANIELS, GERRODO FORREST and others
Defendant / Appellant:
EDDIE JONES, Warden, Warden of Pontiac Correctional Center, WILLARD O. ELYEA, Doctor, Medical Director, WENDY BLANK, Chief of Medical Health Services of IDOC and others
Firas Ayoubi v. Latoya Hughes, et al
as 23-2838
Plaintiff / Appellant:
FIRAS M. AYOUBI
Defendant / Appellee:
LATOYA HUGHES, J.B. PRITZKER, NELLIE BOONE and others
Firas Ayoubi v. Latoya Hughes, et al
as 23-2705
Plaintiff / Appellant:
FIRAS M. AYOUBI
Defendant / Appellee:
LATOYA HUGHES, L. STEWART, NELLIE BOONE and others
Firas Ayoubi v. Latoya Hughes, et al
as 23-2689
Plaintiff / Appellant:
FIRAS M. AYOUBI
Defendant / Appellee:
LATOYA HUGHES, L. STEWART, NELLIE BOONE and others
Anthony Ashford v. Hughes Lochard, et al
as 23-1785
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANTHONY ASHFORD
Defendant / Appellee:
HUGHES LOCHARD, Doctor and DAVID MARCOWITZ
John Custer v. Kevin Lyons, et al
as 23-1150
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN CUSTER
Defendant / Appellee:
KEVIN LYONS, JODI M. HOOS, D.A. SHELLY and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
