Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit
Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Lee Ann McKay v. Thomas G. Bruton, et al
as 24-1744
Petitioner: LEE ANN MCKAY
Respondent: THOMAS G. BRUTON and REBECCA R. PALLMEYER
Lee Ann McKay v. John J. Tharp, Jr.
as 23-2072
Petitioner: LEE ANN MCKAY
Respondent: JOHN J. THARP, JR.
Interested Party: CITY OF CHICAGO
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-1251
Plaintiff / Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Type: Civil Rights Jobs
Harold McKay v. Shaliza Odom, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 17-3594
Plaintiff - Appellant: HAROLD MCKAY
Defendant - Appellee: SHALIZA ODOM, Dentist, WEXFORD HEALTH SOURCES, INC., Dental Department and JANE DOE, Dental Assistant
Terrance Hollowell v. Joel Bornkempt, et al
as 17-2788
Plaintiff - Appellant: TERRANCE HOLLOWELL
Defendant - Appellee: JOEL E. BORNKEMPT, Attorneys with Reisenfeld & Associates, LPA, LLC, TIMOTHY D. MCKAY, Attorneys with Reisenfeld & Associates, LPA, LLC, ROBERT E. ALTMAN, III, Attorneys with Reisenfeld & Associates, LPA, LLC and others
Christy Rios, et al v. Bayer Corporation, et al
as 16-3896
Plaintiff - Appellee: CHRISTY RIOS, KELLY STRALEY, CHRYSTAL MCMANAMON and others
Defendant - Appellant: BAYER CORPORATION, BAYER HEALTHCARE LLC, BAYER ESSURE, INC. and others
USA v. Jamaul McKay
as 13-1400
Plaintiff - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant: JAMAUL R. MCKAY
Jamaul McKay-Bey v. USA
as 13-1152
Petitioner - Appellant: JAMAUL R. MCKAY-BEY
Respondent - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Marlenea Jackson, et al v. McKay-Davis Funeral Home, et al
as 12-8042
Petitioner: MARLENEA JACKSON and ERICA JACKSON
Respondent: MCKAY-DAVIS FUNERAL HOME and TRAVELERS INSURANCE COMPANY
Jamaul McKay-Bey v. USA
as 10-3763
Petitioner - Appellant: JAMAUL R. MCKAY-BEY
Respondent - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?