Cases 41 - 50 of 64
Floyd v. Aramark Correctional Services et al
as 4:2017cv04045
Plaintiff:
Sebron Floyd
Defendant:
Aramark Correctional Service LLC, Steve Dredge, Sandra Simpson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shanklin v. Liberty Health Care Corp et al
as 4:2016cv04010
Plaintiff:
Reginald Bernard Shanklin
Defendant:
Liberty Health Care Corp, Department of Human Services, Anderson Freeman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Freeman v. Pfister
as 1:2015cv01230
Petitioner:
James . Freeman
Respondent:
Randy Pfister
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Webb v. Saddler et al
as 3:2015cv03135
Petitioner:
Richard G Webb
Respondent:
Gregg Scott and Freeman Anderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Freeman v. McFarland Mental Health Center et al
as 3:2015cv03058
Plaintiff:
Patrick Freeman
Defendant:
McFarland Mental Health Center, Jocelyn Forrest, Mark Kerr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Freeman v. United States of America
as 3:2013cv03371
Petitioner:
Tyron D Freeman
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Freeman v. Madigan et al
as 2:2013cv02181
Plaintiff:
Edwin Freeman
Defendant:
Lisa Madigan, Rod R Blagojevich, S A Godinez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Freeman v. United States of America
as 4:2013cv04057
Petitioner:
Lemoyne Freeman
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Powers v. Lochard et al
as 3:2013cv03134
Plaintiff:
Thomas Powers
Defendant:
Hugh Lochard, Michael Bednarz, Wexford Health Services Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lurz et al v. Saddler et al
as 3:2011cv03396
Plaintiff:
Timmy Lurz, Nicholas Bauer, Richard G Webb and others
Defendant:
Michelle R B Saddler, Carol L Adams, Anderson Freeman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
