Cases 1 - 10 of 24
Ball v. Illinois Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2023cv03245
Plaintiff:
Roslind Ball
Defendant:
Illinois Department of Corrections, Rob Jeffreys, Latoya Hughes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lloyd v. Village of Maywood et al
as 1:2022cv01249
Plaintiff:
Vibron Lloyd
Defendant:
Village of Maywood, Nathaniel Booker, Maywood Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dupree v. Wexford Medical et al
as 2:2021cv02140
Defendant:
Illinois Department of Corrections, Wexford Medical, . Duncan and others
Plaintiff:
Donna Dupree
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Young v. Melvin et al
as 1:2018cv01370
Plaintiff:
Bryain Young
Defendant:
Kendra Wolf, Mark Delia, Michelin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Martin v. Skeens et al
as 1:2018cv01292
Defendant:
S. Simpson, Jacqueline Lashbrook, Sandra Boechman and others
Plaintiff:
Derrick Martin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Billops v. Prentice et al
as 1:2018cv01254
Defendant:
Todd Nelson, Reginold Brewer, K Davidson and others
Plaintiff:
Marlon Billops
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Coffee v. Melvin et al
as 1:2017cv01297
Plaintiff:
Lazerrick Coffee
Defendant:
Michael Melvin, Terry Kennedy, Emily Ruskin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dupree et al v. Locke et al
as 1:2017cv01104
Plaintiff:
Donna Dupree and Sherry Hartison
Defendant:
Angela Locke, Clara Sharon, Linnie and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hogle v. Baldwin et al
as 1:2017cv01059
Plaintiff:
Donna Hogle
Defendant:
John Baldwin, Melvin Hinton, Wexford Health Sources, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kucinsky v. Jones et al
as 1:2016cv01191
Plaintiff:
Charles Kucinsky and All Past Present and Future Prisoners
Defendant:
Donna . Jones, McCormick, . Prentiss and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
