Cases 11 - 20 of 21
Dukes v. Godinez et al
as 1:2013cv01569
Plaintiff:
William Dukes
Defendant:
Salvadore Godinez, Randy Pfister, Melvin Reed and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
H.C. Duke & Son, LLC v. Prism Marketing Corporation et al
as 4:2011cv04006
Plaintiff:
H.C. Duke & Son, LLC
Defendant:
Prism Marketing Corporation , Superior Quality Equipment, Inc. , Steven Levine and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Foley v. Smith et al
as 2:2010cv02218
Plaintiff:
James Dean Foley
Defendant:
Lauri J Smith, David Ryan, City of Danville Illinois and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Duke v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2008cv02090
Plaintiff:
Raymond P Duke
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
State of Indiana County of Vermillion et al v. Duke Energy Indiana Inc
as 2:2007mc02082
Plaintiff:
State of Indiana County of Vermillion, Jody T Yoho and Penelope Yoho
Defendant:
Duke Energy Indiana Inc
State of Indiana County of Vermillion et al v. Duke Energy Indiana Inc
as 2:2007mc02079
Plaintiff:
State of Indiana County of Vermillion, Jody T Yoho and Penelope Yoho
Defendant:
Duke Energy Indiana Inc
State of Indiana County of Vermillion et al v. Duke Energy Indiana Inc
as 2:2007mc02081
Plaintiff:
State of Indiana County of Vermillion, Jody T Yoho and Penelope Yoho
Defendant:
Duke Energy Indiana Inc
State of Indiana County of Vermillion et al v. Duke Energy Indiana Inc
as 2:2007mc02080
Plaintiff:
State of Indiana County of Vermillion, Jody T Yoho and Penelope Yoho
Defendant:
Duke Energy Indiana Inc
Duke & Son v. MIM Design Group et al
as 4:2007cv04035
Plaintiff:
H C Duke & Son Inc
Defendant:
MIM Design Group, Ira Sumkin and Michael Benward
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Foley v. Ryan et al
as 2:2007cv02074
Plaintiff:
James Dean Foley
Defendant:
David J Ryan, Lauri Smith, Dukes Ryan Meyer & Goodwinn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
