Cases 41 - 50 of 54
DAVIS et al
as 1:2010cv03559
Plaintiff:
TRACY DAVIS , RAYMOND JONES , KEVIN MOORE and others
Defendant:
EXCEL, INC., GLENN DEESE and MICHAEL BROZOVICH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv50208
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv05551
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Broadcast Music, Inc. et al v. Premier Entertainment Group of Illinois, Inc. et al
as 1:2009cv00470
Plaintiff:
Broadcast Music, Inc., Broadcast Music, Inc., Hip City Music, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Premier Entertainment Group of Illinois, Inc., James A. D'Ambrosio and Robert J. Newell
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv05896
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Newell v. Chandler
as 1:2008cv03711
Petitioner:
Jan Newell
Respondent:
Nedra Chandler
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Villacci v. Newell Rubbermaid, Inc.
as 1:2007cv04708
Plaintiff:
Cindy A. Villacci and Cindy A. Villacci
Defendant:
Newell Rubbermaid, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Newell Operating Company v. Vision Industries Group, Inc.
as 1:2007cv02996
Plaintiff:
Newell Operating Company
Defendant:
Vision Industries Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Newell v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2007cv02650
Plaintiff:
Jacqueline Newell and Jacqueline Newell
Defendant:
City of Chicago, John Doe, Jim Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Newell Operating Company v. Ou et al
as 3:2007cv50084
Plaintiff:
Newell Operating Company and Newell Operating Company
Defendant:
Arthur Ou and Sonoma Hardware
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
