Cases 1 - 10 of 5,519
Whitfield v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2024cv04667
Plaintiff:
Corris A Whitfield
Defendant:
City Of Chicago, Officer John J. Salinas, Anthony Rojas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Bailey v. Vecchio et al
as 1:2024cv04629
Plaintiff:
Martin Bailey
Defendant:
Joseph D Vecchio and City Of Chicago
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv04467
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Dillard v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2024cv04396
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Dillard, II
Defendant:
City of Chicago, CW Martin, Jr and M K Ingram
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McKenzie v. Ferrantella et al
as 1:2024cv04353
Plaintiff:
Charles McKenzie
Defendant:
P.O. Ferrantella, P.O. Piskorek and City of Chicago
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Patrick v. Spradley et al
as 1:2024cv04377
Plaintiff:
Kiyan Patrick
Defendant:
Ernest Spradley, Jake Schmeisser, Ravyn Morgan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mathis v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2024cv04278
Plaintiff:
Jarvis Mathis
Defendant:
City Of Chicago, R. Collins, M. Ferguson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Williams v. Ortega et al
as 1:2024cv04485
Plaintiff:
Tyrie Williams
Defendant:
Elvis Ortega, Kevin Stephans, Paul Lane and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv04197
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Streeter et al v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2024cv04158
Plaintiff:
Jovan Streeter and Marquita Beecham
Defendant:
City Of Chicago, Kenneth Sunde, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
