Cases 1 - 10 of 41,013
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00232
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Yoquelet v. Noble County Sheriffs Department et al
as 1:2024cv00233
Plaintiff:
Kyle Lee Yoquelet
Defendant:
Noble County Sheriffs Department, Jenny Cummins and Fisher
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00046
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Jackson v. USA
as 3:2024cv00468
Petitioner:
Khalil M Jackson
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Barry v. Indiana State of et al
as 3:2024cv00467
Plaintiff:
Scott Thomas Barry
Defendant:
Indiana State of, Christina Reagle, Brian English and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00464
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Burkes v. Sweeny et al
as 3:2024cv00463
Defendant:
Nathaniel Sweeny, Lance Sands, Joshua Carder and others
Plaintiff:
Jimmie DeVaughn Burkes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shepardson v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv00196
Plaintiff:
Deborah A Shepardson
Defendant:
Commissioner of SSA Martin J O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Miller v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2024cv00466
Plaintiff:
Eric L Miller
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (RSI)
Pizer v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00231
Plaintiff:
Jennifer L Pizer
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (RSI)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
