Cases 31 - 40 of 884
TAYLOR v. SUPERINTENDENT
as 1:2017cv04420
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT
Petitioner:
DAVID S. TAYLOR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
NEWLIN v. SUPERINTENDENT
as 1:2017cv04394
Petitioner:
DONALD NEWLIN
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
ASHLOCK v. SUPERINTENDENT
as 1:2017cv04347
Petitioner:
CHRISTOPHER ASHLOCK
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
PARSLEY v. SUPERINTENDENT
as 3:2017cv00191
Miscellaneou:
BRANCHVILLE CF (Court Use Only)
Petitioner:
MICHAEL PARSLEY
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MOUREY v. SUPERINTENDENT
as 1:2017cv04300
Petitioner:
JOE E. MOUREY
Miscellaneou:
PLAINFIELD CF (Court Use Only)
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
HOWARD v. SUPERINTENDENT
as 1:2017cv04239
Petitioner:
LANCE HOWARD
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
JONES v. SUPERINTENDENT
as 3:2017cv00183
Miscellaneou:
BRANCHVILLE CF (Court Use Only)
Petitioner:
JUSTIN JONES
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BURRIS v. SUPERINTENDENT
as 3:2017cv00184
Miscellaneou:
BRANCHVILLE CF (Court Use Only)
Petitioner:
DOUGLAS A. BURRIS
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
HALL v. SUPERINTENDENT
as 1:2017cv04147
Petitioner:
DENNIS HALL
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
SMITH v. SUPERINTENDENT
as 1:2017cv04074
Miscellaneou:
PLAINFIELD CF (Court Use Only)
Petitioner:
ARON SMITH
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
