Cases 81 - 90 of 303
DANIELS v. BUTTS
as 1:2017cv02493
Respondent:
KEITH BUTTS
Petitioner:
RAMAR DANIELS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
DANIELS v. BUTTS
as 1:2017cv02335
Respondent:
KEITH BUTTS
Petitioner:
RAMAR DANIELS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
DANIELS v. BUTTS
as 1:2017cv02336
Respondent:
KEITH BUTTS
Petitioner:
RAMAR DANIELS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MANLEY v. BUTTS
as 1:2017cv02280
Respondent:
KEITH BUTTS
Petitioner:
JAMES E. MANLEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
CRITTENDEN v. BUTTS
as 1:2017cv02279
Respondent:
KEITH BUTTS
Petitioner:
LAMARR T. CRITTENDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
HOLIDAY v. BUTTS
as 1:2017cv02040
Respondent:
KEITH BUTTS
Petitioner:
PAUL HOLIDAY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MOORE v. BUTTS et al
as 1:2017cv01998
Respondent:
KEITH BUTTS and KNIGHT
Miscellaneou:
CORRECTIONAL INDUSTRIAL - CIC (Court Use Only) and PENDLETON CF (Court Use Only)
Petitioner:
GARGANUS MOORE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
GATES v. BUTTS
as 1:2017cv01921
Respondent:
KEITH BUTTS
Petitioner:
STEVEN GATES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
RILEY v. BUTTS
as 1:2017cv01867
Respondent:
KEITH BUTTS
Petitioner:
CLINTON RILEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BERRY v. JAY, et al
as 2:2017cv00194
Plaintiff:
JAVON CROCKETT BERRY and JAVON LANCE CROCKETT BERRY
Defendant:
ROBERT BUGHER, KEITH BUTTS, CORIZON INC and others
Miscellaneou:
WABASH VALLEY E-FILE (COURT USE ONLY)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
