Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00061
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12112 Americans with Disabilities Act - Employment Discrimination
SHURN v. BROWN et al
as 1:2020cv00637
Plaintiff:
BRANDON SHURN
Defendant:
HURBERT BROWN and BIG M TRANSPORTATION, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
FRYE et al v. D & M EXCAVATING, INC.
as 1:2017cv02553
Defendant:
D & M EXCAVATING, INC.
Plaintiff:
DAVID FRYE and INDIANA LABORERS WELFARE, PENSION, TRAINING AND DEFINED CONTRIBUTION TRUST FUNDS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
MADBAK et al v. ANTHEM INSURANCE COMPANIES INC et al
as 1:2016cv03197
Defendant:
ANTHEM HEALTH PLANS OF KENTUCKY, INC. and ANTHEM INSURANCE COMPANIES INC
Plaintiff:
LAILA MADBAK and R & M AVIATION, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
UNLIMITED PRODUCTIVITY v. O&M ENGINEERING, INC.
as 1:2014cv02094
Defendant:
O&M ENGINEERING, INC.
Plaintiff:
UNLIMITED PRODUCTIVITY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
BURKS et al v. J&M MANUFACTURING, INC. et al
as 3:2014cv00025
Plaintiff:
RICHARD BURKS, SHAWN BURKS and TRACY BURKS
Defendant:
J&M MANUFACTURING, INC., KAR-TECH, INC. and SCOTT INDUSTRIAL SYSTEMS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
MELSON v. E&M CONSTRUCTION, INC. OF INDIANAPOLIS et al
as 1:2013cv01472
Defendant:
BILL WEASE MASONARY, INC., EDDIE COX, JR., E&M CONSTRUCTION, INC. OF INDIANAPOLIS and others
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN MELSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
TRUSSEL v. R & M TRANSPORTATION, INC.
as 1:2013cv00225
Defendant:
R & M TRANSPORTATION, INC.
Plaintiff:
KELVIN TRUSSEL
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
BT&M INVESTMENTS, INC. v. CORAL TELECOM, INC.
as 1:2008cv00482
Plaintiff:
BT&M INVESTMENTS, INC. and BT&M INVESTMENTS, INC.
Defendant:
CORAL TELECOM, INC. and CORAL TELECOM, INC.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
