Cases 1 - 10 of 393
TERRELL v. WAL-MART STORES EAST LP
as 1:2024cv01130
Plaintiff:
MELISSA TERRELL
Defendant:
WAL-MART STORES EAST LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01486
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117 Americans with Disabilities Act - Enforcement
HARDESTY v. WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP
as 1:2024cv01425
Defendant:
WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP
Plaintiff:
Terri Hardesty
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
MITCHELL v. WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP.
as 1:2024cv00917
Defendant:
WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP.
Plaintiff:
SYLVIA MITCHELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
MCLAIN v. WALMART, INC. et al
as 1:2024cv00686
Plaintiff:
Shelby McLain
Defendant:
WALMART, INC. and WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
COVINGTON v. WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP
as 1:2024cv00665
Plaintiff:
RONALD COVINGTON
Defendant:
WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
CORNELIUS et al v. WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP
as 1:2024cv00471
Plaintiff:
Marcia Cornelius and Kenneth Cornelius
Defendant:
WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
PEREZ v. WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP
as 1:2024cv00568
Plaintiff:
GLORIA PEREZ
Defendant:
WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
MCCLUSKY v. WAL-MART STORES EAST LP
as 1:2024cv00496
Plaintiff:
KIMBERLY MCCLUSKY
Defendant:
WAL-MART STORES EAST LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
ESTATE OF GLENN PAUL KOEHRING v. WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP
as 1:2024cv00401
Plaintiff:
THE ESTATE OF GLENN PAUL KOEHRING and ESTATE OF GLENN PAUL KOEHRING
Defendant:
WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
