Cases 101 - 110 of 4,572
Hanley v. Mercy Health Hospital and Medical Center et al
as 2:2024cv00108
Plaintiff:
Gary M Hanley
Defendant:
Mercy Health Hospital and Medical Center, Town of Geneva Police Department and Ryan Smelker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Stahmann v. Ludwig
as 2:2024cv00122
Plaintiff:
Rhoda Stahmann
Defendant:
Brett Ludwig
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Stahmann v. Muellenbach
as 2:2024cv00123
Plaintiff:
Rhoda Stahmann
Defendant:
Eric Muellenbach
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00134
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
LaPlante v. City of Muskego et al
as 2:2024cv00215
Plaintiff:
John R LaPlante
Defendant:
City of Muskego, Samuel Weinkauf, Shawn Diedrich and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00222
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00221
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Gonzalez-Nunez v. Caballero-Lopez et al
as 2:2024cv00081
Plaintiff:
Antonia M Gonzalez-Nunez
Defendant:
Jose A Caballero-Lopez, Alberto Varcacel-Ruiz, Gloria M De Jesus Machargo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gonzalez-Nunez v. Wisconsin Department of Health Services
as 2:2024cv00077
Plaintiff:
Antonia M Gonzalez-Nunez
Defendant:
Wisconsin Department of Health Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gonzalez-Nunez v. Verser
as 2:2024cv00057
Plaintiff:
Antonia M Gonzalez-Nunez
Defendant:
Christopher M Verser, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
