Cases 51 - 60 of 60
Maus et al v. Baenen et al
as 2:2013cv00868
Plaintiff:
Brian A Maus
Defendant:
Michael Baenen , Sarah Cooper, Pete Erickson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. City of Milwaukee Police Department et al
as 2:2013cv00628
Plaintiff:
Bruce Terrell Davis
Defendant:
City of Milwaukee Police Department, James M Hernandez and Michael S Murphy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Flayter v. Walls et al
as 2:2013cv00077
Plaintiff:
Patrick A Flayter
Defendant:
Ed Walls, James Greer, David Burnett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dahlk v. Woomer et al
as 2:2012cv00556
Defendant:
Michell Woomer, Timothy Pierce , Stephanie Friedman and others
Plaintiff:
John G Dahlk
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dietrich v. Wisconsin Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2011cv00352
Plaintiff:
Jacob T Dietrich
Defendant:
Wisconsin Department of Corrections, Kathryn R Anderson, Michael Baenen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Laumann v. Raemisch et al
as 2:2011cv00170
Plaintiff:
Nickolas J Laumann
Defendant:
Richard Raemisch , Paul Sumnicht, Charles Larson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Toussaint Bolling v. Murphy et al
as 1:2010cv00678
Plaintiff:
Jermaine Toussaint Bolling
Defendant:
Mary Lynn Murphy and Karl Held
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Irby v. Smith et al
as 2:2008cv00258
Plaintiff:
Leon Irby
Defendant:
Amy Smith, Welcome F Rose, Michael S Thurmer and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Vanden Heuvel v. Zwicky et al
as 2:2007cv00992
Plaintiff:
Kit Vanden Heuvel
Defendant:
James Zwicky, Michael Murphy, Sheri Graeber and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Deal v. State of Wisconsin et al
as 2:2007cv00721
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Loyd Deal
Defendant:
State of Wisconsin, Waupun Correctional Institution, ICE Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
