Cases 41 - 50 of 25,041
Duque v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2024cv02183
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSAOGC
Plaintiff:
Juan Pedro Duque
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
BOYCE v. O'MALLEY
as 2:2024cv00447
Plaintiff:
SAMMUAL K. BOYCE
Defendant:
MARTIN O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
SMITH v. O'MALLEY
as 4:2024cv00127
Defendant:
MARTIN O'MALLEY
Plaintiff:
DANIEL R. SMITH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Pevonka, Jean v. O'Malley, Martin
as 3:2024cv00655
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Plaintiff:
Jean Pevonka
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Hildreth, Kenneth v. O'Malley, Martin
as 3:2024cv00656
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Hildreth
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
McCuan v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2024cv02173
Plaintiff:
Daniel H. McCuan
Interested Party:
SSAOGC
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Reichling v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2024cv02172
Interested Party:
SSAOGC
Plaintiff:
John Reichling
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Greene v. Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
as 1:2024cv08457
Plaintiff:
Cedric Greene
Defendant:
Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
Schultz v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv50378
Defendant:
Martin O Malley
Plaintiff:
Clayton Schultz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Harrison v. Social Security
as 2:2024cv00320
Plaintiff:
Yvette N. Harrison
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
