Cases 91 - 100 of 150
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00449
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Christopher White, et al v. George Keely, et al
as 14-3663
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER P. WHITE and REFFCO II, L.P.
Defendant - Appellee:
GEORGE E. KEELY, JOYCE MORRIS, TRICIA RAKE and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv08391
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Aircraft Check Services Compan, et al v. Verizon Wireless, et al
as 14-2301
Plaintiff - Appellant:
AIRCRAFT CHECK SERVICES COMPANY, NICHOLAS ILTSOPOULOS, DAVID KEEFER and others
Defendant - Appellee:
VERIZON WIRELESS, T-MOBILE USA, INC., SPRINT NEXTEL CORPORATION and others
USA v. Carl Morri
as 14-2242
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
CARL MORRIS
IN RE: FAILURE TO COMPLY
as 1:2014mc00052
Respondent:
JONATHAN ROBERT ANDERSON, MAX WAYNE APPLE, JILL MICHELLE ARNOLD and others
In Re:
FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH CONTINUING LEGAL EDUCATION REQUIREMENTS, NONPAYMENT OF ATTORNEY REGISTRATION FEES, AND/OR FAILURE TO SUBMIT IOLTA CERTIFICATION
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00123
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
WHITE et al v. KEELY et al
as 1:2014cv00471
Defendant:
GEORGE KEELY, MICHAEL MAURER, JOYCE MORRIS and others
Plaintiff:
REFFCO II, L.P. and CHRISTOPHER P. WHITE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
USA v. Paul Davis, Jr., et al
as 14-1124
Plaintiff - Appellant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellee:
PAUL DAVIS, JR., ALFRED WITHERS, JULIUS MORRIS and others
Terry et al v. Carnival Corporation
as 1:2013cv08414
Plaintiff:
Cassie Terry , Tammy Jones , Nathan R Means and others
Defendant:
Carnival Corporation
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Type:
Other Statutes
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
