Cases 21 - 30 of 2,000
Jones v. Turner et al
as 3:2023cv03355
Petitioner:
Jeffrey T. Jones
Respondent:
Lynea Turner, Federal Bureau of Investigation, Department of Justice and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Richard Gardipee v. William E. Duffin
as 23-3382
Petitioner:
RICHARD THOMAS GARDIPEE
Respondent:
WILLIAM E. DUFFIN
USA v. Lerin Hughes
as 23-3354
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
LERIN E. HUGHES
Richard Gardipee v. William E. Duffin
as 23-3351
Petitioner:
RICHARD THOMAS GARDIPEE
Respondent:
WILLIAM E. DUFFIN
Merritt v. Grady, et al
as 1:2023cv16243
Plaintiff:
Dennis R. Merritt
Defendant:
Judge Joseph Grady, Judge Bradley David, Chief Justice Clint Hull and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
USA v. Jacob E. Pangborn
as 23-3105
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
JACOB E. PANGBORN
Lauren Bennett, et al v. Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc., et al
as 23-2993
Plaintiff / Appellee:
LAUREN BENNETT, individually and as parent and next friend of T.B. and W.B., MICHAEL BENNETT, individually and as parent and next friend of W.B. and T.B., TERRI E. BENNETT and others
Defendant / Appellant:
SMITH & WESSON BRANDS, INC., SMITH & WESSON SALES COMPANY and SMITH & WESSON, INC.
Raul v. Crane et al
as 1:2023cv14748
Plaintiff:
Pinchas E. Raul
Defendant:
Christopher M. Crane, Joseph Dominguez, Anne R. Pramaggiore and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Securities Violation
Virgil Griffin v. Douglas Wardlow, et al
as 23-8021
Petitioner:
VIRGIL E. GRIFFIN
Respondent:
DOUGLAS WARDLOW, DUJUAN D. LOTT, Sergeant, ROBERT CARTER and others
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Woodbury et al
as 1:2023cv14255
Plaintiff:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Defendant:
Arline E. Woodbury and Joyce L. Holverson
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
