Cases 31 - 40 of 55
MOORE v. FINANCIAL BUSINESS AND CONSUMER SOLUTIONS, INC.
as 1:2015cv01728
Defendant:
FINANCIAL BUSINESS AND CONSUMER SOLUTIONS INC. and JH PORTFOLIO DEBT EQUITIES, LLC
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL MOORE
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Moore v. Swerbs Financial Inc et al
as 2:2014cv00114
Plaintiff:
Arkeesha Moore
Defendant:
Swerbs Financial Inc and Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
MEDICAL MUTUAL OF OHIO et al v. HASKELL
as 1:2013cv02017
Plaintiff:
DAN T. MOORE COMPANY and MEDICAL MUTUAL OF OHIO
Defendant:
JOHN R. HASKELL
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv01086
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
IN RE: FAILURE TO COMPLY
as 1:2012mc00053
In Re:
FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH CONTINUING LEGAL EDUCATION REQUIREMENTS AND/OR NONPAYMENT OF ATTORNEY REGISTRATION FEES
Respondent:
PHILIP LYNN CARSON, EDWIN HENRY FISHER, JR., TODD EDWIN HAINES and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv00166
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00312
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Holland v. Gary City of et al
as 2:2012cv00062
Plaintiff:
Robert Holland
Defendant:
Gary City of, Scott King, Hamilton Carmouche and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WEAVER v. BLATT, HASENMILLER, LEIBSKER & MOORE, LLC
as 1:2012cv00174
Defendant:
BLATT, HASENMILLER, LEIBSKER & MOORE, LLC
Plaintiff:
TAMMIE WEAVER
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
United States Securities and Exchange Commission v. Moore
as 3:2012cv00061
Plaintiff:
United States Securities and Exchange Commission
Defendant:
Brian S Moore
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
