Other Statutes Cases filed in the Seventh Circuit Courts
Cases 61 - 70 of 100
Mink v. Velocity Investments, LLC
as 1:2013cv02178
Plaintiff: Judy Mink
Defendant: Velocity Investments, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Jones v. P.N. Financial Inc.
as 1:2012cv10391
Plaintiff: Judy Jones
Defendant: P.N. Financial Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2012cv00446
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv01791
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Doe #1 et al v. United States of America et al
as 1:2012cv09052
Plaintiff: John Doe #1, John Doe #2, Jane Doe #3 and others
Defendant: United States of America , Patrick J. Fitzgerald, David Hoffman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION v. IAB MARKETING ASSOCIATES, LP et al
as 1:2012mc00101
Defendant: FAV MARKETING, INC., JUDY M. HAMILTON, ROY D. HAMILTON and others
Plaintiff: FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
Receiver: CHARLENE KOONCE
Federal Trade Commission v. IAB Marketing Associates, LP et al
as 1:2012cv08244
Plaintiff: Federal Trade Commission
Defendant: IAB Marketing Associates, LP , Independent Association of Businesses , Healthcorp International, Inc. and others
Receiver: Charlene C. Koonce
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Kaplan v. Arctic Zero, Inc.
as 1:2012cv06825
Plaintiff: Judy Kaplan
Defendant: Arctic Zero, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gordon Dain v. Daniel Bertrand
as 12-1799
Petitioner: GORDON L. DAIN
Respondent: JUDY P. SMITH
Marderosian v. Topinka et al
as 1:2012cv02262
Plaintiff: Steven A. Marderosian
Defendant: Judy Baar Topinka and Dan Rutherford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?