Cases 1 - 10 of 85,137
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv08751
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00326
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1679 Credit Repair Organization Act
Elzen v. American Home Shield Corporation
as 1:2024cv01206
Plaintiff:
David Van Elzen
Defendant:
American Home Shield Corporation
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF BALTIMORE v. BIOGEN, INC.
as 1:2024cv08700
Defendant:
BIOGEN, INC.
Plaintiff:
MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF BALTIMORE
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Lagmanson et al v. Robinhood Markets, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv08721
Plaintiff:
Marcus Lagmanson, Brian Belderrain and Anthony R Reyes
Defendant:
Robinhood Financial LLC, Robinhood Markets, Inc., E*Trade Financial Corp. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1337 Sherman-Clayton Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv08682
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv08687
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv08692
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv08698
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv08706
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
