Cases 1 - 10 of 6,870
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00774
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00775
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Potla v. Mayorkas et al
as 2:2024cv00778
Plaintiff:
Saida Rao Potla
Defendant:
Alejandro Mayorkas, Ur M. Jaddou and Merrick B. Garland
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Armstrong v. Boyland Auto BGMC LLC et al
as 2:2024cv00765
Plaintiff:
William Louis Armstrong
Defendant:
Boyland Auto BGMC LLC, General Motors, Kunes Buick GMC and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00413
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Stone v. Wisconsin Elections Commission
as 2:2024cv00760
Plaintiff:
Jay Stone
Defendant:
Wisconsin Elections Commission
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Jerome v. US Department of Homeland Security et al
as 2:2024cv00475
Plaintiff:
Olajide Sunday Jerome
Defendant:
US Department of Homeland Security, US Citizenship and Immigration Services, Alejandro Mayorkas and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00731
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00395
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Epic Systems Corporation v. Focus Systems, LLC et al
as 3:2024cv00393
Plaintiff:
Epic Systems Corporation
Defendant:
Focus Systems, LLC, Focus Solutions, LLC, NOVO Health Technology Group, LLC and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
