Cases 21 - 30 of 43
CAFFEE et al v. KING et al
as 4:2014cv00038
Plaintiff:
BROOKE D. CAFFEE, IN and SUSAN HAWKINS, IN
Defendant:
DAYTON FREIGHT LINES, INC., OH and MARTIN R. KING
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Tomoiage et al v. Matute et al
as 3:2014cv00330
Defendant:
Javier Matute , Newton XPRESS, LLC and Martin Transportation Systems, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Matei Tomoiage , Alina Tomoiage and Carina Tomoiage
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Tomoiage et al v. Matute et al
as 1:2014cv00333
Defendant:
Javier Matute , Newton XPRESS, LLC and Martin Transportation Systems, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Matei Tomoiage , Alina Tomoiage and Carina Tomoiage
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Martin v. United States of America
as 2:2013cv01252
Plaintiff:
Michelle R Martin
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Martin v. Brown et al
as 1:2013cv07259
Plaintiff:
Steven B Martin
Defendant:
Joshua M Brown and James E Robinson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Geeters v. AE Distribution, Co.
as 1:2013cv07033
Plaintiff:
Martin L Geeters
Defendant:
AE Distribution, Co.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1981
Ferguson v. Chicago et al
as 1:2013cv06488
Plaintiff:
Sheila Ferguson
Defendant:
City of Chicago and Anthony Martin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Villagomez v. A & R Freight, Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv06052
Defendant:
A & R Freight, Inc. , Towne Air Freight, Inc. , Towne Air Freight, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Martin Villagomez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Martin v. United States of America
as 1:2013cv03736
Plaintiff:
Yolandra Martin
Defendant:
United States of America and United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 39 U.S.C. § 409 Postal Service
Williams et al v. Feeney et al
as 1:2013cv01224
Plaintiff:
Hope K. Williams , Olin B. Kicklighter and Annie Gibbs
Defendant:
Martin Feeney, Feeney Xpress Transport, Bary Franklin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
