Cases 41 - 50 of 31,362
Atrella Reynolds v. Scottrade, Inc./TD Ameritrade, Inc., et al
as 24-1842
Plaintiff:
ATRELLA REYNOLDS
Defendant:
SCOTTRADE, INC./TD AMERITRADE, INC., CHARLES SCHWAB CORPORATION, SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION and others
Mains, Donald v. Conley, William et al
as 3:2024cv00324
Plaintiff:
Donald Lee Mains
Defendant:
Judge William Conley, Martin D. O'Malley, Social Security Workers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Clarence Jackson v. State of Illinois, et al
as 24-1824
Plaintiff:
CLARENCE B. JACKSON
Defendant:
STATE OF ILLINOIS and ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES
Higgs v. Urbanski et al
as 1:2024cv02252
Plaintiff:
Jayden Higgs
Defendant:
Raymond Urbanski, Roger Farias, Gabriel Navarro and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Logan v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2024cv03897
Plaintiff:
Leonard Logan
Defendant:
City Of Chicago, Glenn Evans, Alejandro Almazan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Brown v. South Bend Community School Corporation et al
as 3:2024cv00377
Plaintiff:
Heidi Davonne Brown
Defendant:
South Bend Community School Corporation and Department of Child Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Yoder v. DeGuilio et al
as 3:2024cv00378
Plaintiff:
Philip J Yoder
Defendant:
Jon E DeGuilio, John M Maciejczyk, Miguel Oviedo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kareen Hayes v. Department of Corrections
as 24-1828
Plaintiff:
KAREEN HAYES
Defendant:
WISCONSIN DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Bennett v. Robinhood Financial LLC
as 1:2024cv03829
Plaintiff:
Douglas D. Bennett
Defendant:
Robinhood Financial LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Roberts v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2024cv02167
Plaintiff:
Joseph Roberts
Defendant:
City of Chicago, Former CPD Sergeant Ronald Watts, Kallatt Mohammed and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
