Cases 131 - 140 of 212
Herndon v. SBHA et al
as 3:2015cv00169
Plaintiff:
Cynthia M Herndon
Defendant:
SBHA and J Watford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Woodard v. Nike Retail Services Inc et al
as 3:2015cv00171
Plaintiff:
Terry A Woodard
Defendant:
Nike Retail Services Inc, Tia Blair and Christy Carn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RILEY et al v. CITY OF KOKOMO, INDIANA, HOUSING AUTHORITY
as 1:2015cv00391
Plaintiff:
JODONNA BROWN, KATHRYN KNIGHT and ANGELA RILEY
Defendant:
CITY OF KOKOMO, INDIANA, HOUSING AUTHORITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Hays et al v. Marathon Petroleum Corporation et al
as 3:2014cv01860
Plaintiff:
Joshua Rebel Hays and Alicia Mae Hays
Defendant:
Marathon Petroleum Corporation, Marion Haines and Crystal Louis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Fair Housing Center of Central Indiana Inc. et al v. Brookfield Farms Homeowners' Association
as 4:2014cv00058
Plaintiff:
Fair Housing Center of Central Indiana Inc , Jennifer Hendrickson and Benjamin Hendrickson
Defendant:
Brookfield Farms Homeowners' Association
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
BLACKBURN v. MYERS et al
as 1:2014cv01115
Plaintiff:
TIA M BLACKBURN
Defendant:
INDIANAPOLIS HOUSING AGENCY and RUFUS BUD MYERS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Brown v. Ameristar Casino East Chicago LLC
as 2:2014cv00191
Plaintiff:
Christopher E Brown
Defendant:
Ameristar Casino East Chicago LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 13131
Barhams v. Indiana Department of Correction
as 3:2014cv01578
Plaintiff:
Yolanda D Barhams
Defendant:
Indiana Department of Correction
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Balovski v. Cressy & Everett Management Corp
as 2:2014cv00072
Plaintiff:
Riste Balovski
Defendant:
Cressy & Everett Management Corp
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Hussey et al v. Schimizzi
as 3:2014cv00016
Plaintiff:
Nan Hussey and South Bend Human Rights Commission
Defendant:
Josephine Schimizzi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
